Boyd verses Presky
Boyd suggests in her book "It's Complicated," that the term “Digital Native” does not give us
a clear picture of the depth to which students can truly understand and
process the accuracy of the content they are finding through technology. Thus,
to use the term “digital native” so broadly, Prensky fails to take into account whether
or not all students have the necessary help to develop broad digital competency.
As a result, according to Boyd, “educators
and the public end up reproducing digital inequality because more privileged
youth often have more opportunities to develop these skills outside the
classroom. When we assume that youth will just absorb all things digital
through exposure, we absolve ourselves of our responsibility to help teenagers
develop necessary skills.” I agree with Boyd because not only do students have
different technical skills, they also have different backgrounds and experience
so the way in which they process these technical skills will be different too.
In my experience in using technology with students, they can navigate the
internet easily and efficiently, but many of them cannot tell if what they are
seeing is accurate information or not.
They tend to take what they see as true and correct, and rarely question
the integrity of the content they are viewing.
From my 15 years of classroom experience, I also agree with Marc
Prensky when he states that “Digital Natives are used to receiving information
really fast. They like to parallel process and multi-task. They prefer their
graphics before their text rather than the opposite. They prefer random access
(like hypertext). They function best when networked. They thrive on instant
gratification and frequent rewards. They prefer games to “serious” work.” As a result, according to Prensky, teachers,
who are often digital immigrants, will have to find better and more creative ways to engage their digital
natives in order to keep them interested and engaged. Although I believe this to be true, it still
does not take into account the depth to which youth understand the given
information. Just because they are used
to receiving information fast while multi-tasking at the same time, doesn’t
give the educator a complete picture as to how they are processing the
information they are receiving, and whether or not the information is complete
and accurate.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI could not agree more. As teachers we have a job to instruct all students on technology tools, especially the "have nots."
ReplyDeleteI would also agree with your last statement that explains that just because students can access information quickly using a digital platform this does not necessarily mean that they are capable of thinking critically about the information. As educators we need to switch from being people who teach content to people who teach students how to analyze and think critically.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what you said about preferring games over serious work and how it is always becoming harder for us to keep students engaged.
ReplyDelete